Oh well, I can’t add links so I will guide you to a couple articles in Slate , the Daily Beast and the Daily Collegian. It’s like the Loch ness Monster, all the evidence is anecdotal. I have read the same studies and I’m glad you can have one but the majority can’t. You don’t assume everyone has an IQ of 140 when only 1% of the populace has so you adept your communication to the other 99%. I don’t want to start a blog because I suck at PS and can’t possibly preoccupy my mind with sex 24/7.

Well, I’m really glad that you like to get your information from college students and opinion writers – cause they are SO qualified… However, your sole article written by someone with a PhD actually acknowledges the existence of the G-Spot and simply says that there’s still a great deal that we don’t know about it. And I’ve said the same thing in many of my responses to people about the G-Spot.

There is still so much that we don’t know or understand about the female orgasm/female anatomy and how it works because scientists have only recently started studying it with more scrutiny! To claim that you know for certain that it doesn’t exist, just shows how ignorant you are. Anecdotal evidence was all we had for centuries to prove that women could even orgasm at all! Well, we know differently now, don’t we? Or are you going to start disputing that as well?

If you don’t want to start your own blog, fine, just stay away from mine. Because you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.